My client was charged with a DUI case in Orange County North Justice Center for an arrest by the Fullerton Police Department. He was facing significant jail time due to out of state priors, and a criminal history. Other lawyers recommended that we take a quick plea before his case got worse. My client decided that he wanted to fight the case at all costs and we challenged the government's case every step of the way.
I filed a motion to suppress evidence based on the circumstances of the stop. The stop was made by Fullerton Police responding to a fight at a bar in downtown Fullerton. The officer testified at the hearing that based on the 911 call regarding the fight, he responded to the scene. The officer saw two females on the corner being detained by another officer and he saw my client leaving the area. Based on this, he initiated a traffic stop on my client, gave him a breathalyzer test which read nearly double the legal limit and ultimately arrested him for DUI.
I argued that the officer had no reasonable suspicion to stop my client. No call had been made regarding his vehicle or anything he had done illegally. The officer had no information linking the girls in the fight to my client or his vehicle. The officer had nothing other than suspicion and a hunch that my client was somehow connected to the fight. I thought the case was a clear violation of my client's rights under the 4th ammendment but I knew it could go either way. I have had similar cases in the past where the Judge has ruled that the proximity of the stop to the investigation is enough to trigger reasonable suspicion. Fortunately in this case, the Judge was all ears. Not only did he grant the motion and dismiss my client's case entirely, he dressed down the DA in open court and let him know that this case never should have even been filed in the first place!
My client avoided jail, probation, fines, and a conviction. He also avoided any penalties on his driver's license that could have resulted from the conviction. If you have been drinking, call a cab! But if you have been arrested call the Law Offices of Mark A.
The best top 10 >>> Read more...
I filed a motion to suppress evidence based on the circumstances of the stop. The stop was made by Fullerton Police responding to a fight at a bar in downtown Fullerton. The officer testified at the hearing that based on the 911 call regarding the fight, he responded to the scene. The officer saw two females on the corner being detained by another officer and he saw my client leaving the area. Based on this, he initiated a traffic stop on my client, gave him a breathalyzer test which read nearly double the legal limit and ultimately arrested him for DUI.
I argued that the officer had no reasonable suspicion to stop my client. No call had been made regarding his vehicle or anything he had done illegally. The officer had no information linking the girls in the fight to my client or his vehicle. The officer had nothing other than suspicion and a hunch that my client was somehow connected to the fight. I thought the case was a clear violation of my client's rights under the 4th ammendment but I knew it could go either way. I have had similar cases in the past where the Judge has ruled that the proximity of the stop to the investigation is enough to trigger reasonable suspicion. Fortunately in this case, the Judge was all ears. Not only did he grant the motion and dismiss my client's case entirely, he dressed down the DA in open court and let him know that this case never should have even been filed in the first place!
My client avoided jail, probation, fines, and a conviction. He also avoided any penalties on his driver's license that could have resulted from the conviction. If you have been drinking, call a cab! But if you have been arrested call the Law Offices of Mark A.
The best top 10 >>> Read more...
- Mood:fun
- Music:The Doors
This is getting to be a sad situation when even the SCOTUS ignores the Constitution and does it right in your face.Indeed, the Court has spit again in your face.
By now you know that the Supreme Court has denied certiorari without comment to New Jersey attorney Leo Donofrio’s petition, a document that was simple enough for even a Member of Congress to understand. Donofrio’s argument did not depend on where Illegal Alien-Elect Hussein was born. All the evidence available so far – including the fact that he refuses to produce a genuine Hawaiian birth certificate and the fact that his grandmother says she was there when he was born in Mombasa – says he is not a natural born citizen and therefore is ineligible to be President.
But, again, Leo Donofrio’s argument did not depend on that. On one of his own sites, Hussein says that he was a British subject (as well as an American) when he was born, because that is what his father was. Remember, that is what Hussein says himself. And a dual-citizen at birth – a citizen born with divided loyalties – cannot be natural born. He cannot be President.
Also, remember that Donofrio was not asking the Supreme Court to rule that Hussein cannot be President. His petition simply asked that, since Hussein’s eligibility has been seriously challenged, he be required to prove it. As many observers have noted, this should have been quite simple. Although everything about the man is secret – his college records, his law school records, his medical records, his client records and on and on and on – had he simply produced a non-forged, genuine birth certificate, his citizenship and all other questions would have disappeared.
What principle has the High Court installed with this ruling? If a candidate for the presidency no longer must prove his eligibility under the law – the Constitution – then certainly no one else is required to prove his eligibility for any other government job. To whom more is granted, more is required. More is required of a candidate for President. If he is not required, certainly you are not either.
Until now, you needed to validate your resume to get a driver’s license or a library card, to qualify for Medicare, to work in the Post Office, etc. Now you don’t. The liars at the law schools will say this is poppycock. Ignore them Wait for the lawsuits. Wait for the lawsuits from other illegal aliens like Hussein, who maintain that they need prove nothing because Hussein does not.
The Court once again, as it has so many times for so many years, has spit in the face of the U.S. Constitution. By invalidating the clear and crucial constitutional language about presidential eligibility, it has invalidated the Constitution itself, or at least tried to. Before you argue that my argument is not based in law, remember that the process I mention goes all the way back to 1954 and Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), in which the Warren Court cited not law, but a book by a foreign Communist to foment a revolution that led to riot, murder and outrages like forced school busing. (See my book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights.)
Need I remind you that you are superior to the Supreme Court, that the only power it has is power you have delegated, power you could rescind and take back. Need I remind you that you are superior to the President, to the Congress, indeed, to the Constitution itself, which you created. And now the Low Court has spit in your face.
Here are some thoughts from the President of the United States: “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.
“Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.” — Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277
“This member of the Government was at first considered as the most harmless and helpless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what the law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt.” — Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:114
In other words, the Supreme Court does not deserve the reverence it receives. It has no more of your delegated power than the other branches. It is not superior to them. It is merely co-equal. It is nine politicians in black robes. Again, this comes to us from the President of the United States. In the face of this usurpation, where are we headed?
Hussein said recently that Americans should stop their present frenzied purchase of guns. Hussein said they have nothing to fear because he is a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. Of course his record from the beginning gives him the lie. His appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General confirms that he will do everything he can to confiscate your guns. It is difficult to believe that any man could be as big a liar as former President Billy Bubba Slime (“I did not have sex with that woman”), but Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein could surpass him.
Indeed, a bill is now circulating through state legislatures that would require registration of all ammunition and eventual confiscation. The theory apparently is that if they can’t get your guns they will neutralize them by taking the ammo. They are trying to sneak it through into law before you hear about it. Question: What do you intend to do with all those guns? Whom would you shoot?
More cases like Leo Donofrio’s are moving through the courts. A day or so after you read this, another will arrive at the Supreme Court. Hey, High Court! This is your chance to prove me a fool. What a delight it would be say I was wrong; to celebrate the Supreme Court’s reaffirmation that the Constitution is supreme. How likely is it that the Court will show such judicial courage?
The few media morons and conspiracy factotums who have mentioned the issue now say the High Court ruling settles the matter. James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal scoffs at the issue. Rush Humbug, Sissy Levin, Shallow Sean Hannitwit, Loopy Laura, Hugh Blewitt Company go out of their way to avoid it. Los Angeles radio faggot Al Rantel and Bull Dyke Tammy Bruce apparently did mention it but contrary orders must have gone down because now they tell their listeners not to. Tammy warned that bloggers who do so would be permanently banned from her site.
But the issue will not go away. If the High Court fails to require Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein to prove his eligibility, it will fester. Innumerable ramifications will erupt during his “Administration.” Suppose, in obedience to his Caucasian masters, he orders the military to make war on Iran (without the Declaration of War the Constitution requires, no less). What would the military do?
Remember, you are not asking them to deny the presidency to Hussein. You are merely asking them to require him to prove his eligibility. This should be very easy to do for lame ducks like Tar Heel Elizabeth Dole, for instance, who has nothing political to lose and therefore nothing to fear. On her way out, lame ducks like her could have the last laugh by performing this historic service to the Constitution.
“Barack Obama is the best candidate for the Hispanic community because our community wants a united country. Obama is an immigrant. When he speaks to Latinos, he doesn’t just speak about immigration and civil rights. . . .” Remember, this is not a criticism of Hussein, not an attack. Top Democrud Richardson means this as a high compliment. So his comment is what the lawyers call an “admission against interest.”
And he says Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein is an “immigrant.” That means he is not a “natural born citizen.” Which in turn means he is ineligible to be President. Here is the link to the interview. Go there and listen a few times: Then pass our slogan along.
Repatriation – Not Inauguration.
Read the entire article at News with Views.
Americano new top 10 >>> Read more...
By now you know that the Supreme Court has denied certiorari without comment to New Jersey attorney Leo Donofrio’s petition, a document that was simple enough for even a Member of Congress to understand. Donofrio’s argument did not depend on where Illegal Alien-Elect Hussein was born. All the evidence available so far – including the fact that he refuses to produce a genuine Hawaiian birth certificate and the fact that his grandmother says she was there when he was born in Mombasa – says he is not a natural born citizen and therefore is ineligible to be President.
But, again, Leo Donofrio’s argument did not depend on that. On one of his own sites, Hussein says that he was a British subject (as well as an American) when he was born, because that is what his father was. Remember, that is what Hussein says himself. And a dual-citizen at birth – a citizen born with divided loyalties – cannot be natural born. He cannot be President.
Also, remember that Donofrio was not asking the Supreme Court to rule that Hussein cannot be President. His petition simply asked that, since Hussein’s eligibility has been seriously challenged, he be required to prove it. As many observers have noted, this should have been quite simple. Although everything about the man is secret – his college records, his law school records, his medical records, his client records and on and on and on – had he simply produced a non-forged, genuine birth certificate, his citizenship and all other questions would have disappeared.
What principle has the High Court installed with this ruling? If a candidate for the presidency no longer must prove his eligibility under the law – the Constitution – then certainly no one else is required to prove his eligibility for any other government job. To whom more is granted, more is required. More is required of a candidate for President. If he is not required, certainly you are not either.
Until now, you needed to validate your resume to get a driver’s license or a library card, to qualify for Medicare, to work in the Post Office, etc. Now you don’t. The liars at the law schools will say this is poppycock. Ignore them Wait for the lawsuits. Wait for the lawsuits from other illegal aliens like Hussein, who maintain that they need prove nothing because Hussein does not.
The Court once again, as it has so many times for so many years, has spit in the face of the U.S. Constitution. By invalidating the clear and crucial constitutional language about presidential eligibility, it has invalidated the Constitution itself, or at least tried to. Before you argue that my argument is not based in law, remember that the process I mention goes all the way back to 1954 and Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), in which the Warren Court cited not law, but a book by a foreign Communist to foment a revolution that led to riot, murder and outrages like forced school busing. (See my book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights.)
Need I remind you that you are superior to the Supreme Court, that the only power it has is power you have delegated, power you could rescind and take back. Need I remind you that you are superior to the President, to the Congress, indeed, to the Constitution itself, which you created. And now the Low Court has spit in your face.
Here are some thoughts from the President of the United States: “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.
“Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.” — Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277
“This member of the Government was at first considered as the most harmless and helpless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what the law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt.” — Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:114
In other words, the Supreme Court does not deserve the reverence it receives. It has no more of your delegated power than the other branches. It is not superior to them. It is merely co-equal. It is nine politicians in black robes. Again, this comes to us from the President of the United States. In the face of this usurpation, where are we headed?
Hussein said recently that Americans should stop their present frenzied purchase of guns. Hussein said they have nothing to fear because he is a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. Of course his record from the beginning gives him the lie. His appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General confirms that he will do everything he can to confiscate your guns. It is difficult to believe that any man could be as big a liar as former President Billy Bubba Slime (“I did not have sex with that woman”), but Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein could surpass him.
Indeed, a bill is now circulating through state legislatures that would require registration of all ammunition and eventual confiscation. The theory apparently is that if they can’t get your guns they will neutralize them by taking the ammo. They are trying to sneak it through into law before you hear about it. Question: What do you intend to do with all those guns? Whom would you shoot?
More cases like Leo Donofrio’s are moving through the courts. A day or so after you read this, another will arrive at the Supreme Court. Hey, High Court! This is your chance to prove me a fool. What a delight it would be say I was wrong; to celebrate the Supreme Court’s reaffirmation that the Constitution is supreme. How likely is it that the Court will show such judicial courage?
The few media morons and conspiracy factotums who have mentioned the issue now say the High Court ruling settles the matter. James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal scoffs at the issue. Rush Humbug, Sissy Levin, Shallow Sean Hannitwit, Loopy Laura, Hugh Blewitt Company go out of their way to avoid it. Los Angeles radio faggot Al Rantel and Bull Dyke Tammy Bruce apparently did mention it but contrary orders must have gone down because now they tell their listeners not to. Tammy warned that bloggers who do so would be permanently banned from her site.
But the issue will not go away. If the High Court fails to require Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein to prove his eligibility, it will fester. Innumerable ramifications will erupt during his “Administration.” Suppose, in obedience to his Caucasian masters, he orders the military to make war on Iran (without the Declaration of War the Constitution requires, no less). What would the military do?
Remember, you are not asking them to deny the presidency to Hussein. You are merely asking them to require him to prove his eligibility. This should be very easy to do for lame ducks like Tar Heel Elizabeth Dole, for instance, who has nothing political to lose and therefore nothing to fear. On her way out, lame ducks like her could have the last laugh by performing this historic service to the Constitution.
“Barack Obama is the best candidate for the Hispanic community because our community wants a united country. Obama is an immigrant. When he speaks to Latinos, he doesn’t just speak about immigration and civil rights. . . .” Remember, this is not a criticism of Hussein, not an attack. Top Democrud Richardson means this as a high compliment. So his comment is what the lawyers call an “admission against interest.”
And he says Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein is an “immigrant.” That means he is not a “natural born citizen.” Which in turn means he is ineligible to be President. Here is the link to the interview. Go there and listen a few times: Then pass our slogan along.
Repatriation – Not Inauguration.
Read the entire article at News with Views.
Americano new top 10 >>> Read more...
- Mood:family
- Music:The Smiths
Hemet criminal defense attorneys at Wallin Klarich have more than 30 years of experience defending southern California defendants who are facing criminal charges, including misdemeanors, felonies, DUI/DWI and DMV hearings. Wallin and Klarich lawyers regularly represent persons accused of felony and misdemeanor charges who reside in the Hemet area and are familiar with the judges and prosecutors who will likely be assigned to your case. Our highly qualified attorneys know the procedures followed in all courts in southern California and that is one reason we are able to achieve such positive results for our clients.
Our law firm has over thirty year experience in helping our clients clean up their criminal records, helping clients in defending them against Hemet concealed weapons charges, restraining order violations, driving on suspended license or federal crime charges as well as various violent crimes and white collar crimes. The vast experience of our southern California criminal defense attorneys ensures that the law offices of Wallin Klarich will have the resources required to help you with your Hemet criminal defense case.
At Wallin Klarich, we approach every case with the belief that the person we're defending could easily be one of our own family members. If you or someone you love needs a criminal defense attorney in Southern California, you should call Wallin Klarich today for a free evaluation of your case. Call 1-888-280-6839 or fill out our online consultation form to get in contact with a legal professional today. We will be there when you call.
Americano news >>> Read more...
Our law firm has over thirty year experience in helping our clients clean up their criminal records, helping clients in defending them against Hemet concealed weapons charges, restraining order violations, driving on suspended license or federal crime charges as well as various violent crimes and white collar crimes. The vast experience of our southern California criminal defense attorneys ensures that the law offices of Wallin Klarich will have the resources required to help you with your Hemet criminal defense case.
At Wallin Klarich, we approach every case with the belief that the person we're defending could easily be one of our own family members. If you or someone you love needs a criminal defense attorney in Southern California, you should call Wallin Klarich today for a free evaluation of your case. Call 1-888-280-6839 or fill out our online consultation form to get in contact with a legal professional today. We will be there when you call.
Americano news >>> Read more...
- Mood:gleeful
- Music:Attrition
DUI (Driving Under the Influence) is a serious offense and if you have been charged with a DUI or driving drunk you should seek legal help at once from a DUI attorney.
Each year, states enact stronger DUI laws and more severe drunk driving penalties. You could lose your drivers license, be placed in jail and fined substantial fees. Your car insurance rates may rise and you could end up with a criminal conviction on your record that could impact your future and your employment opportunities.
Using a DUI attorney or DUI Lawyer who focuses on drunk driving defense could make a difference in the outcome of your case. This is why it is important to use DUI.com to locate a qualified DUI Lawyer in your area.
DUI.com is a national directory of drunk driving defense attorneys. Most of the DUI lawyers listed in our directory are members of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the National College of DUI Defense as well as certified in administering the standardized field sobriety test and intoxilyzer breath test. The DUI attorneys on DUI.com limit their practice to primarily DUI/DWI and drunk driving defense. It is important that you chose a criminal defense lawyer who primarily dedicates their practice to DUI defense, because they know the DUI laws and drunk driving consequences in your state. Choosing the right DUI lawyer may help you save your drivers license and get your drunk driving charge reduced or even dismissed.
News >>> Read more...
- Mood:Playing
- Music:Eminem
- Mood:playful
- Music:Kate Bush
- Mood:gleeful
- Music:The White Stripes
Profile
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
ultimatumm- ultimatumm
Syndicate
